We do not predict prices. This page shows where server memory prices actually are, what our own daily snapshots have done, the supply-side facts we have cited, and a directional outlook that carries the date it applies to and the list of things that would prove it wrong. As of 2026-08-14 the floor is $4.312/GB across 49 in-stock listings.
Live figures updated · refreshed every 4-5 hours · outlook reviewed monthly
Daily average price per TB across all tracked SATA enterprise HDDs, daily floor GB, tracked since 2026-03-26. Live data from the DatacenterDisk price tracker — updates every 2 hours. Window reflects the actual history in our database, not a modeled projection.
Every row says where its numbers came from. Reported rows are figures published by others, cited and dated - we did not measure them. Measured rows are our own series, computed from our daily snapshots. Mixing the two without saying which is which is how a page ends up citing itself.
| What | Then | Now | Provenance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Our tracked server memory floor, per GB | $9.359 (2026-03-26) | $4.312 (2026-08-14) | Measured by us |
As of 2026-08-14, 8 of 48 scored server memory sit above their own recent typical level, 30 sit at the cheap end of their own record, and 10 are priced where they usually are. That distribution is the answer to “has waiting been working” - it is a count of badge states, not a price comparison.
In-stock only, cheapest per gigabyte first.
| Product | Capacity | Condition | Price | Per GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-Tech 64GB DDR4-2666 ECC LRDIMM | 64GB | New | $275.96 | $4.312 | Buy |
| A-Tech 16GB DDR4-2133 ECC RDIMM | 16GB | New | $72.48 | $4.530 | Buy |
| Samsung 32GB DDR4-2400 ECC RDIMM | 32GB | New | $148.95 | $4.655 | Buy |
| SK Hynix 64GB DDR4-2400 ECC RDIMM | 64GB | New | $304.95 | $4.765 | Buy |
| Micron 32GB DDR4-2666 ECC RDIMM | 32GB | New | $158.95 | $4.967 | Buy |
| A-Tech 32GB DDR4-2666 ECC RDIMM | 32GB | New | $176.58 | $5.518 | Buy |
| Samsung 16GB DDR4-2133 ECC RDIMM | 16GB | New | $92.18 | $5.761 | Buy |
| Supermicro 64GB DDR4-2666 ECC LRDIMM | 64GB | New | $399.00 | $6.234 | Buy |
Every figure in this section is read from our own catalogue at the moment you loaded the page, and it is a LEVELS observation rather than a rate. The floor is the single cheapest in-stock listing per gigabyte; it can move because one cheap listing appeared or vanished, without the market having done anything. That is why percentage changes on this site come from a matched-model index that compares each listing against its own prior price, and never from comparing one day's floor to another's.
As of 2026-08-14, the floor sits at $4.312/GB and the median across 49 in-stock listings at $11.09/GB. The gap between those two is worth as much as either number on its own: a floor far below the median means the cheap end is one or two listings deep, and a floor close to it means the whole catalogue is priced tightly together.
The two condition tracks price separately and we never merge them. New stock starts at $4.312/GB and the refurbished track at $29.56/GB. A refurbished floor well below the new one is the ordinary state of this market rather than a bargain signal, and scoring one against the other would manufacture a discount that does not exist.
The picks table further down carries the same data at row level, in stock only, so a reader who decides to act can do so without leaving the page. It never shows an out-of-stock row, which is why you will not find an empty price cell anywhere in this cluster.
Our snapshots for this category begin on 2026-03-26 and run to 2026-08-14, which is 142 days of daily observations. That window is stated because a trend without its window is not checkable, and because 142 days is a real but modest history - long enough to show a level, short enough that a single unusual month shapes it.
Over the most recent 30 days of that series - 2026-07-15 to 2026-08-14 - the daily floor moved from $5.155/GB to $4.312/GB, a change of -16.4%. Read that as what the cheapest listing did, not as what the market did.
The chart is a levels series by design. A levels chart answers 'what does the cheap end cost' and it answers it honestly; it does not answer 'has the market moved', because a single listing entering or leaving changes it. Both questions are legitimate and they need different instruments, so we do not use one chart to imply the other.
Memory is the category where the supply story is most concentrated and best documented. Three manufacturers control over 95% of global DRAM output, which means the market has no long tail to absorb a shock - what those three decide to make is what exists.
What they decided to make is High Bandwidth Memory for AI accelerators. HBM took roughly 23% of DRAM wafers in 2026 against about 8% in 2024, and a wafer producing HBM is a wafer not producing the conventional DDR4 and DDR5 that servers use.
The economics behind that choice are not marginal. HBM has been reported to earn three to five times the revenue per wafer of conventional DRAM, which makes the allocation decision straightforward for a manufacturer and unfavourable for everyone buying ordinary server memory.
And the decision is already made for this cycle: SK hynix has confirmed its entire 2026 HBM production is committed. Capacity that is committed is not capacity that responds to conventional demand, whatever conventional demand does.
Directionally, as of the date above: this is the clearest of the three categories, and the read is that pressure remains upward. Wafer allocation has moved, the economics driving it are large rather than marginal, and the 2026 supply is already committed.
The distinguishing feature of this category is that the constraint has a stated horizon. A committed production year is a fact with an end date attached, which is more than either of the other two categories offers. It does not tell us what happens after, and we will not extrapolate past what has been confirmed.
For buyers this makes the memory market the one where the supply story most directly explains the price you are seeing, and the one where waiting has the weakest case on the available facts.
This is the section that makes the rest of the page worth citing. An outlook with no stated falsifiers cannot be wrong, and a claim that cannot be wrong is not information. Here is exactly what we are watching, and what each of these moving would mean:
HBM's share of DRAM wafers falling back toward its earlier level. The 23%-versus-8% comparison is the load-bearing figure here, and a reversal would show up in the same reporting.
The revenue-per-wafer gap narrowing. The three-to-five-times economics are what make the allocation rational; if that compresses, conventional DRAM becomes worth making again.
Committed 2026 capacity being reallocated or expanded - a manufacturer stating that conventional DRAM output is rising would directly contradict the current read.
Our own index establishing a sustained downward level. The RAM price index on this site is the check on all of the above, and it is built to show levels rather than to flatter a narrative.
We check these monthly and publish the result as a dated check-in whether or not the read changed. An outlook that never revises is not being tested.
If a server needs memory, buy the memory. This is the category where the supply facts most clearly explain the price, and where the case for waiting is weakest on the evidence available.
Buy on cost per gigabyte and check the used and pulled-module market, which prices partly independently of the new-module constraint - our memory pages carry both.
If you are specifying a new build, size the memory deliberately rather than generously. In a constrained market, the cheapest gigabyte is the one you correctly decided not to buy.
These are the things that would change the outlook above. They are checked in every monthly edition, and the edition says so whether or not any of them moved.
Every monthly edition, newest first, archived rather than overwritten. Each one opens by stating what the previous edition said and what our data actually did - an archive that never grades itself is a blog, not a record.
The main forecast page covers the method and the hard drive picture in full · what counts as a good price · the cheapest per terabyte right now · hard drive forecast · SSD forecast · the storage crisis tracker follows the category-level picture.
On the facts we have cited, the pressure is upward and this is the clearest of the three categories we forecast. Three manufacturers control over 95% of DRAM output, HBM for AI accelerators took roughly 23% of wafers in 2026 against about 8% in 2024, that HBM earns a reported three to five times the revenue per wafer, and SK hynix has confirmed its entire 2026 HBM production is committed. We will not print a price or a percentage for the future - the falsifiers section lists what would change this read.
Because the wafers that would make it are making something more profitable. HBM for AI accelerators has taken a rising share of DRAM wafer capacity - roughly 23% in 2026 against about 8% in 2024 - and it earns several times the revenue per wafer. With three manufacturers controlling over 95% of output, there is no fourth supplier to absorb the gap.
The live floor is at the top of this page and in the picks table below, refreshed every few hours from our own catalogue. It is the single cheapest in-stock module per gigabyte, so treat it as a levels observation rather than a market rate - our RAM price index is the better instrument for direction.
On the current facts, waiting has the weakest case in this category of the three we cover. The constraint is documented, the economics driving it are large, and the 2026 supply is already committed. If the server needs the memory, buy it and buy on cost per gigabyte.
They are made on the same wafers that HBM is competing for, so both are exposed to the same allocation decision. Our memory pages carry live pricing for each generation separately, which is the honest way to see how each is actually behaving rather than assuming the shortage lands evenly.
Live figures refresh every few hours; the outlook is reviewed monthly and published as a dated check-in. Every outlook statement here carries the date it applies to, and the falsifiers are what we check each month.